Design Decision Records (DDRs) Guide

A Design Decision Record (DDR) is a tool used to document the key decisions made during the design and development of a project. By capturing the context, reasoning, and consequences of decisions, DDRs help teams maintain alignment, improve communication, and provide a historical record of how and why certain choices were made. This guide will walk you through the steps to create effective DDRs.

1. Overview

• Title: Clearly state the title of the decision being documented (e.g., “Adopting a Microservices Architecture”).
• Date: Record the date when the decision was made.
• Status: Indicate the status of the decision (e.g., Proposed, Accepted, Rejected, Superseded).

2. Context

• Background: Provide a summary of the situation or problem that necessitated the decision. Explain the challenges or opportunities that prompted the need for a decision.
• Goals and Objectives: Clearly define the goals and desired outcomes that the decision aims to achieve.

3. Decision

• Decision Statement: Clearly articulate the decision that has been made. Be concise and precise (e.g., “Use PostgreSQL as the primary database for the application”).
• Alternatives Considered: List and describe any alternative options that were considered, including their pros and cons. This demonstrates that other possibilities were evaluated and why they were not selected.

4. Reasoning

• Rationale: Describe the reasoning behind the chosen decision. Include key factors that led to the decision, such as technical requirements, team capabilities, business needs, or cost considerations.
• Criteria for Evaluation: Specify the criteria used to evaluate the alternatives, such as scalability, performance, cost, maintainability, or team expertise.

5. Implications

• Consequences: Outline the expected consequences, both positive and negative, of the decision. Consider how it will impact different stakeholders, timelines, costs, and future development efforts.
• Technical Debt: Highlight any technical debt that may result from the decision, as well as the long-term implications of managing that debt.

6. Mitigation and Follow-Up Actions

• Mitigation Measures: Describe any actions required to mitigate potential negative consequences of the decision.
• Follow-Up Tasks: List any tasks that need to be completed as a result of the decision, such as updates to documentation, additional research, or further testing.

7. Stakeholder Input

• Stakeholders Involved: Identify the stakeholders who contributed to the decision and their roles (e.g., Developers, Product Owners, Architects).
• Stakeholder Concerns: Document any concerns raised by stakeholders and how those concerns were addressed or mitigated.

8. Status and Review

• Status Updates: Keep the status of the decision updated as it moves from Proposed to Accepted, Rejected, or Superseded by a new decision.
• Review Timeline: Specify when the decision should be revisited for evaluation. Some decisions may need to be reassessed due to changing requirements or new information.

9. Documentation and Storage

• Location: Record where the DDR will be stored so that it can be easily accessed by all team members (e.g., Confluence, Git repository).
• Related Documents: Link to any related documents, such as architectural diagrams, meeting notes, or technical specifications.

Supporting Questions

• What alternatives were considered, and why were they rejected?
• How does this decision align with the overall project or organizational goals?
• What are the short-term and long-term implications of this decision?
• Are there any potential risks or areas of uncertainty that need to be monitored?

Roles and Responsibilities

• Decision Maker: Responsible for approving the decision and ensuring it aligns with overall objectives.
• Stakeholders: Provide input, raise concerns, and contribute to evaluating alternatives.
• Document Owner: Maintains the DDR and ensures it is updated as needed.

Best Practices for Writing DDRs

• Be Concise: Focus on the key points and avoid unnecessary details. The record should be easy to read and understand.
• Use Clear Language: Avoid technical jargon unless necessary, and ensure the language is accessible to all team members.
• Keep It Updated: Regularly review and update DDRs as new information becomes available or as the project evolves.
• Make It Collaborative: Involve relevant stakeholders in the decision-making process and document their input.

---

This DDR Guide provides a structured approach to documenting design decisions, ensuring transparency, alignment, and a clear rationale for choices made during the project lifecycle. Use DDRs to support effective decision-making, maintain continuity, and facilitate communication within your team.