Search for the Right Document
< All Topics
Print

Quality Gate Report Example

Quality Gate Report

Date: November 7, 2024
Generated By: CI/CD Pipeline
Project: E-Commerce Platform


Overview

The Quality Gate Report summarizes the results of the automated quality checks performed on the codebase during the latest build. The report includes test coverage, code analysis results, and metrics used to assess code quality. The objective is to ensure that the code meets the quality standards defined in the coding guidelines before merging or deployment.


1. Build Information

  • Build ID: #457
  • Branch: feature/user-authentication
  • Commit Hash: 3fa85f64-5717-4562-b3fc-2c963f66afa6
  • Author: Paul Smith
  • Build Status: Passed

2. Test Results

  • Unit Tests:
    • Total Tests: 150
    • Passed: 148
    • Failed: 2
    • Skipped: 0
  • Integration Tests:
    • Total Tests: 50
    • Passed: 50
    • Failed: 0
    • Skipped: 0
  • Code Coverage:
    • Lines Covered: 89%
    • Branches Covered: 75%
    • Threshold: 85% for lines, 70% for branches
      Status: Passed

3. Static Code Analysis

  • Total Issues: 15
    • Critical: 2
    • Major: 5
    • Minor: 8
  • Critical Issues:
    1. Potential security vulnerability: SQL Injection risk in UserService.java at line 45.
    2. Null pointer exception in OrderProcessor.js at line 120.
  • Major Issues:
    • Unused variables in PaymentGateway.py.
    • Inconsistent naming conventions in OrderController.java.
    • Performance issue: Inefficient algorithm in CartService.cs.
  • Minor Issues:
    • Deprecated methods used in ProductManager.kt.
    • Spacing and formatting issues in customer_signup.html.

Status: Critical issues must be resolved before merging.


4. Code Quality Metrics

  • Cyclomatic Complexity: 8 (Threshold: 10)
    Status: Passed
  • Maintainability Index: 85 (Threshold: 70)
    Status: Passed
  • Technical Debt: 2 hours
    Status: Acceptable
  • Duplication: 2.5% (Threshold: 5%)
    Status: Passed

5. Security Analysis

  • Vulnerabilities Detected: Yes (2 Critical)
  • Dependency Check:
    • Vulnerable Packages: None
  • Encryption Check: Passed

Status: Security issues require immediate attention.


6. Code Style and Linting

  • Linting Warnings: 12
  • Linting Errors: 0
    Status: Warnings should be reviewed, but errors are clear.

7. Performance Checks

  • Execution Time: Average response time for API calls improved by 10%.
  • Memory Usage: No significant memory leaks detected.
  • Load Testing: Passed at 500 concurrent users without degradation.

8. Summary and Recommendations

  • Overall Status: Warning
  • Recommendations:
    • Resolve Critical Issues: SQL Injection and null pointer exception must be fixed before merging.
    • Address Major Issues: Review and refactor inefficient algorithms and improve variable usage.
    • Code Coverage: Maintain current coverage levels and continue adding tests for uncovered branches.
    • Security: Prioritize fixing vulnerabilities and consider adding additional security testing in future builds.

Next Steps:

  • Developers should address the highlighted issues and resubmit the code for a new quality gate review.
  • Any unresolved warnings and minor issues can be logged for future improvement.

Generated by: CI/CD Automation System
Tools Used: SonarQube, ESLint, JUnit, and OWASP Dependency-Check

Table of Contents